fbpx

Writers International Edition

Sofia Skleida

Comparative evaluation of the role of nature in Dionysios Solomos' poems 'The Destruction of Psara' and 'The Free Besieged II

Comparative evaluation of the role of nature in Dionysios Solomos’ poems ‘The Destruction of Psara’ and ‘The Free Besieged II’ (fragments I, II, and III)

Dionysios Solomos (1798 – 1857), a Greek poet and central figure of the Heptanese School, is considered and regarded as the national poet of Greece, not only because he composed the National Anthem but also for his use of earlier poetic traditions (Cretan literature, folk songs). His poetry revolves around major themes that have occupied philosophers and poets, such as freedom, nature, religion, death, and love. In his poems, freedom triumphs over nature, and religion over death.

In the poem “The Destruction of Psara”, the central theme is the glorification of the heroes who fell in the tragic events at Psara following the island’s capture by the Turks in June 1941. The heroism of the Greeks, love for the homeland, and the personified Glory are exalted. Deeply moved, the poet seeks to emphasize through his verses that the demise of the Greeks will be accompanied by immortal glory. Nature plays a prominent role in this depiction. Solomos, with exceptional skill, managed to convey the magnitude of the destruction, the emotional intensity, and the grief. In this tragic setting, nature shares in the suffering: “Completely black ridge—few tufts of grass—desolate land.” The highest part of the island, its ridge, is also black, symbolizing total destruction and indicating the supreme sacrifice humanity can reach. Contrasting images frame the vividness of the description: “Glory alone—brilliant young men—desolate land” (the image of the devastated landscape).

 In this complete stillness, the only moving entity is Glory. With expressive simplicity yet vivid imagery, Solomos manages to depict the desolation of the place and the glory owed to the heroes of Psara. In the desolate landscape, ravaged by destruction, the personified Glory walks alone, contemplating the brilliant young men, the heroic warriors who perished there.

Simultaneously, Dionysios Solomos addresses the themes of nature and freedom in another of his remarkable poems, “The Free Besieged”, which occupied him more than any other. In this work (Fragments I, II, and III), the ideal of absolute freedom is achieved only in the real world. The differing representation of nature in this poem compared to “The Destruction of Psara” is evident. The besieged, suspended between two extremes, confront the beauty and vibrancy of spring nature on one side and the destructive forces of the enemy on the other, ultimately sacrificing their lives as an act of heroic resistance. They overcome the challenges they face—first natural (such as hunger), then psychological—until they reach the supreme moment of sacrifice. Nature, intensely active, enchants with its presence: “April dances and laughs with Eros—A little white mountain of sheep moves and bleats—The beauties of heaven—A blue butterfly—Perfumed the wild lily—Nature is enchantment and a dream…” Everything vibrates, nothing remains still. Everything manifests a rhythm, a portion of movement, a sway back and forth. Thus, the Besieged undergo a final trial against the beauties of the surrounding nature, striving for their souls to achieve true freedom by renouncing all earthly things: “Nature is enchantment and a dream—The black stone is golden—With a thousand springs it flows—Whoever dies today dies a thousand times.” 

In contrast, in the poem “The Destruction of Psara,” nature silently and mournfully, both literally and metaphorically, laments and shares in the overall destruction: “completely black ridge—few tufts of grass—desolate land.” In this way, Solomos, by weaving a unique network of contrasting relationships—perhaps influenced by fundamental principles of Hermetic Philosophy—succeeds in making his descriptions more vivid and conveying his multifaceted messages, elevating his heroes and immortalizing iconoclastically the thematic axes of his depiction.

REFERENCES

Beaton  R., Εισαγωγή στη Νεοελληνική Λογοτεχνία, Μτφ. Ε. Ζουργού- Μ. Σπανάκη, Εκδ. Νεφέλη, Αθήνα 1996.

Mackridge P.,  «Τα ποιήματα του Σολωμού και τα κύρια θέματά τους», (απόσπασμα), στο μ. Μπακογιάννης (Επιμ), Ανθολόγιο Κριτικών Κειμένων για τη μελέτη της Νεοελληνικής Λογοτεχνίας ( 19ος και 20ος αιώνας), σ.σ. 29-38, Εκδ. ΕΑΠ, Πάτρα 2008.

Σολωμός  Δ.,«Ελεύθεροι Πολιορκημένοι», (από το Β΄Σχεδίασμα), στο Χ. Δανιήλ (Επιμ), Ανθολόγιο Κριτικών Κειμένων για τη μελέτη της Νεοελληνικής Λογοτεχνίας ( 19ος και 20ος αιώνας), σ.σ. 68-69, Εκδ. ΕΑΠ, Πάτρα 2008.

Σολωμός Δ., «Η καταστροφή των Ψαρών», στο Χ. Δανιήλ (Επιμ), Ανθολόγιο Κριτικών Κειμένων για τη μελέτη της Νεοελληνικής Λογοτεχνίας ( 19ος και 20ος αιώνας), σ. 65, Εκδ. ΕΑΠ, Πάτρα 2008.

 

Odysseas Elytis

Odysseas Elytis: The Interplay of Cosmos and Nature in his Poetry

Among the foremost figures of Greece’s poetic renaissance in the 1930s, three gained international renown. Both George Seferis (1900-1971) and Odysseas Elytis (1911-1979) received the Nobel Prize in Literature, while the works of Yannis Ritsos (1900-1990) were widely translated.  Nikiforos Vrettakos (1912-1991), though recognized within Greece and translated abroad, remains relatively unknown in the English-speaking world.

“I like to begin where winds shake the first branch.”  

Odysseas Elytis, Open Papers

Odysseas Elytis, born on November 2, 1911, in Heraklion, Crete, was relatively obscure outside Greece when he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1979. Although the Swedish Academy had previously honored lesser-known writers such as Eugenio Montale, Vicente Aleixandre, and Harry Martison, its selection of Elytis was nonetheless surprising. In its presentation, the Academy commended his poetry as one that “depicts with sensual strength and intellectual clearsightedness, modern man’s struggle for freedom and creativity.” Elytis’s verse, distinctively personal and deeply reflective of Greek traditions, embraces themes that resonate with a broader humanism.

Elytis applied elements of surrealism selectively, adapting them to fit the Greek landscape and sensibility. His frequent use of free association allowed him to reveal the essence of objects in both their “reality” and their “surreality.” This stylistic choice is evident in his works, where, for instance, a young girl becomes a fruit, a landscape takes on the shape of a human body, and the ambiance of a morning morphs into the form of a tree. 

As Elytis himself stated, “I have always been preoccupied with finding the analogies between nature and language in the realm of imagination, a realm to which the surrealists also gave much importance, and rightly so… Everything depends on imagination, that is, on the way a poet sees the same phenomenon as you do, yet differently from you.”

One of Elytis’s best-known verses captures the essence of his poetic vision: “If you disintegrate Greece, in the end you will see that you are left with an olive tree, a vineyard and a boat. Which means: with so much more you can rebuild it.”

“But you must know that only he who fights the darkness within will the day after tomorrow have his own share in the sun.”  

Odysseas Elytis, The Axion Esti

Elytis’s vision of an individual “paradise” speaks volumes about his worldview: “If a separate personal Paradise exists for each of us, mine must be irreparably planted with trees of words which the wind silvers like poplars, by people who see their confiscated justice given back, and by birds that even in the midst of the truth of death insist on singing in Greek and saying eros, eros, eros.”

Simple yet profound, Elytis’s words often reflect an appreciation for the beauty in the everyday:  

“I can become happy with the simplest things the most insignificant even the every day ones of every day. It is sufficient for me that weeks have Sundays and I am satisfied that years keep their Christmas for the very end, that winters have stone houses dipped in snow, that I know how to discover the hidden bitter herbs in their hiding places. It is enough for me that four people love me a lot… It is enough for me that I love four people a lot that I spend my breath on them alone; that I am not afraid to remember; that I do not care if they remember me; that I can still cry and that I even sing sometimes… that there is music which fascinates me and fragrances that enchant me…”

Through his poetry, Elytis sought to instill hope and optimism, encouraging his compatriots with his vision of renewal, both personal and spiritual. His perspective—a blend of poetic reverence and moral clarity—drew inspiration from Greek cultural roots, referencing figures such as Sappho and Heraclitus. This approach set him apart from the prevailing mood of pessimism that pervaded much of his era.

As a leading voice of Greece’s “generation of the thirties,” Elytis’s work straddles the tension between Greek tradition and European modernism. His first collection, Prosanatolizmi (Orientations), published in 1936, won him recognition as the “sun-drinking poet” for its vivid imagery of light and purity.

Elytis paused his literary work to serve in World War II, fighting in the Albanian Campaign against Mussolini’s forces with the First Army Corps. The harrowing experiences of this period left their mark on him, later inspiring the poem A Heroic and Elegiac Song of the Lost Second Lieutenant of the Albanian Campaign.

In 1959, after a decade-long silence, Elytis published The Axion Esti, a major work structured as a poetic cycle interweaving prose and verse, modeled after the Byzantine liturgy. This work, like much of his poetry, presents the Greek experience through a lens that is intensely personal yet deeply rooted in cultural heritage.

“Your mouth speaks with four hundred roses, beats the trees, overwhelms the entire earth, pours the first shiver into the body.”

Reflecting on his literary mission in Books Abroad, Elytis remarked: “I consider poetry a source of innocence full of revolutionary forces. It is my mission to direct these forces against a world my conscience cannot accept, precisely so as to bring that world through continual metamorphoses more in harmony with my dreams. I am referring here to a contemporary kind of magic whose mechanism leads to the discovery of our true reality.”

Dr. Sofia Skleida

REFERENCES

Αφιέρωμα στον Οδυσσέα Ελύτη,  Περιοδικό «Νέα Εστία» τ. Απριλίου 1997.

Βίττι Μ.,  Οδυσσέας Ελύτης: Βιβλιογραφία 1935-1971(συνεργασία Αγγελικής Γαβαθά), Ίκαρος, Αθήνα 1977.

Bressler C., Literary criticism: an introduction to theory and practice, (a second printing), March 2011. 

Κουτριάνου Ε.,  Με άξονα το φως: Η διαμόρφωση και η κρυστάλλωση της ποιητικής του Οδυσσέα Ελύτη, Ίδρυμα Κώστα και Ελένης Ουράνη, Αθήνα 2002.

Μπελεζίνης Α.,  Ο όψιμος Ελύτης, Ίκαρος, Αθήνα 1999.

Συλλογικό έργο, Δεκαέξι κείμενα για το Άξιον Εστί, Ίκαρος, Αθήνα 2001.

Timothy C.,  The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment, Cambridge UP. p. 2. ISBN 9780521720908,  New York 2011.  

Vitti Μ.,  Οδυσσέας Ελύτης. Κριτική μελέτη, Ερμής, Αθήνα 1991. 

Χατζηγιακουμή Μ.,  Η υπέρβαση της ιστορίας στο έργο του Οδυσσέα Ελύτη,  Ελληνικά Γράμματα, Αθήνα 2004.

 

Ecocriticism and Poetry: The Perception of Nature in Literature

Plato, in his dialogue Timaeus, mentions that plants were created to help humans survive. Aristotle also, in his treatise On the Soul, stated that the soul is characterized by its capacities for nourishment, sensation, intellect, and movement. Of these, plants possess only the capacity for nourishment. While Aristotle emphasizes the shared mental foundation of all living beings, he assigns a more biological significance to the soul of plants compared to Plato’s more philosophical reference.

Plato’s mention of the senses and desires of plants, combined with Neoplatonism, triggered a spiritual understanding of plants within the philosophy and literature of Romanticism. In literature, myth, and even in daily life, plants are emotionally and ideologically charged.

The idea that plants correspond to an archetype or express and reveal a divine presence in nature was central to the literature and philosophy of Romanticism. Transitioning from Romanticism to Modernism, we find Baudelaire, the poet of anti-nature — not in the sense of opposing nature, but rather in his search for the beauty of evil in nature, as the title of his collection The Flowers of Evil suggests. Baudelaire’s poetry also marks the shift from nature to the urban environment. In one of his notes, Baudelaire writes that “the dizzying sensation one feels in a big city is proportional to what one experiences in the midst of nature.”

However, while Baudelaire still portrays a harmonious relationship between the world of nature and the city, a defining characteristic of Modernism is the rupture between humans and nature. T.S. Eliot’s, “The Waste Land”, is regarded in ecocritical studies as a harbinger of the ecological crisis we face today. According to Elizabeth Black, The Waste Land presents a society alienated from nature and on the brink of environmental collapse. “April is the cruellest month,” Eliot writes, as the rebirth of new life revives painful memories buried beneath the snow. The traumatic feeling of a lost past and the painful disconnect from nature can also be observed in some works by Seferis.

It is notable that although Ecocriticism has gained significant traction in European and global studies, it has not been fully utilized in contemporary Greek literature. Ecocriticism is a burgeoning field formed through the collaboration of environmental science, literature, and the arts. The terms ecology and ecocriticism describe this new relationship between art and nature, often connected to issues related to the global ecological crisis.

Ecocriticism examines the relationship between humans and the natural world in literature. It explores how environmental issues, cultural perspectives on the environment, and attitudes toward nature are presented and analyzed. One of the main goals of ecocriticism is to study how individuals in society react to and behave towards nature and ecological concerns. This form of criticism has garnered much attention in recent years due to the increased societal focus on environmental degradation and technological advancement.

Ecocriticism first emerged as a major theoretical movement in the 1990s, aiming to relate literature to the natural environment with the hope that action could be taken against climate change and the destruction of natural habitats. Ecocriticism has a strong ethical component, as the reading of literature is intended to inspire political activism and drive real-world change.

Literary texts can help us realize how humans exploit nature for their own purposes, while also allowing us to fully appreciate the beauty of our environment. They describe the beauty of the natural world, encouraging us to immerse ourselves in nature. Ecocriticism is the result of this new awareness: that soon there may be nothing left in nature to celebrate unless we act carefully.

Ecocritics analyze the human perception of wilderness, how it has evolved over time, and whether or not contemporary environmental issues are accurately depicted in popular culture and modern literature. Other disciplines, such as history, economics, philosophy, ethics, and psychology, are also considered by ecocritics to contribute to this field.

Ecocriticism is interdisciplinary, calling for collaboration between scientists, writers, literary critics, anthropologists, historians, and others. It challenges us to reflect on ourselves and the world around us, critiquing how we represent, interact with, and construct the environment. Approaching a topic from an ecocritical perspective means asking questions not only about a primary literary text but also about broader cultural attitudes toward nature. In this way, ecocriticism brings new dimensions to the analysis and interpretation of literary works and cultural narratives.

Sofia Skleida
Teacher, Writer, MA, Ph.D, Postdoc ,
Academic Director Poetry Department of International Art Institute Europe (International Academy MAQ-IAMAQ)

REFERENCES

Bressler C., Literary criticism: an introduction to theory and practice, (a second printing), March 2011. 

Donn K.,  «Beyond the Wasteland: An Ecocritical Reading of Modernist Trauma Literature», στο Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology, επιμ. Hubert Zapf, Walter de Gruyter, Βερολίνο 2016. 

Glotfelty C. &   Fromm H.,   The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, University of Georgia 1996.

Hume A., «Imagining Ecopoetics: An interview with Robert Hass, Brenda Hilman, Evelyn Reilly, and Jonathan Skinner», Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 19/4, 2012, 751-766. 

Hume Α. &  Osborne G., «Ecopoetics as Expanded Critical Practice. An Introduction», στο Ecopoetics: Essays in the Field, University of Iowa Press, Άιοβα 2018. 

Iovino S., Ecocriticism and Italy: Ecology, Resistance, and Liberation , Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.

Kirkby M., A Victorian Flower Dictionary: The Language of Flowers Companion, with an introduction by Vanessa Diffenbaugh, Random House Publishing Group, Νέα Υόρκη 2011.  

Leaky F.W., Baudelaire and Nature, Manchester University Press, Mάντσεστερ 1969.  

Mosley P.,  «Introduction», στο Maurice Maeterlinck, The Intelligence of Flowers, μετάφραση και εισαγωγή Philip Mosley, State University of New York, Nέα Υόρκη 2008.

Πλάτων., Τίμαιος, Eισαγωγή, Mετάφραση, Σχόλια Βασίλης Κάλφας, Βιβλιοπωλείον της «Εστίας», 2013.

Salabè C.,Ecocritica. La letteratura e la crisi del pianeta ,Donzelli Editore, 2013.

About the Author

Sofia SkleidaSofia Skleida was born in Athens. She studied Philology at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens where she obtained her BA, MA in Pedagogy, Ph.D in Comparative Pedagogy and a postdoctoral research certificate. She also obtained a certification in the Braille language. Today she works as a teacher in secondary education. She took part in conferences and published articles in the Greek and international scientific journals and in conference papers. She was awarded for her participation in poetry and literary contests in Greece and abroad. Her poems have been translated into Italian, English, Spanish, Albanian, Romanian and Bangla. She has published a total of twenty books. She is Vice-President of the Zakynthian Cultural Institute, Member of the jury for new members of the Association of Greek Writers, a regular member at the Panhellenic Union of Writers and at the Association of Greek Writers.